Is Unification Chronicles really just Babylon 5 with the serial numbers filed off?
As folks have started digging through the timeline and other stuff on the wiki, they’ve noticed parallels to Joe Straczynski’s Babylon 5.
- Two ancient races, one devoted to chaos, the other to order, have been at war for millennia.
- The war went cold about a thousand years ago when the chaos ancients were driven away.
- One of the ancients is still buried on a forgotten world at the edge of the galaxy, waiting to be woken up.
- The most powerful of the younger races fought in that war a thousand years ago, suffered horrible losses, and reveres the order-based ancients as gods.
- Humans were genetically manipulated by the order-based ancients.
- Our first contact with the most powerful of the younger races results in a war based on a misunderstanding.
- The most powerful of the younger races calls off the war rather than defeating us.
- The central human hero is a maverick military man with a troubled past, with initials nearly the same as the author’s.
- The human hero leaves his people to go to that forgotten world on the rim, seeking answers.
- The human hero, allied with the one of the order ancients, dies fighting the chaos ancients.
- Once the ancient war is over, the younger races turn on each other.
- The most powerful of the younger races is nearly torn apart by its own caste structure.
- The story ends with the formation of a new galactic government that should ensure a lasting peace.
Wow, a baker’s dozen of damning ripoff points. Sure looks like I’m ripping off Babylon 5. JMS should sue!
Only, really, I’m not.
I’ll admit Babylon 5 is a huge influence for me, and UC was, in part, inspired by what Joe was doing on the TV machine. But it was also inspired by Christopher Golden’s Shadow Saga, and Asimov’s Foundation series, and Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings, and well, just about every other epic I’ve ever read or watched.
Because if you distill the above points down even further, you’ll see that what I’m really ripping off is the Bible. And Gilgamesh. And the Canterbury Tales. And the Iliad. And the Odyssey. And Beowulf. Because really, when you get down to it, mythic structure is mythic structure. Seriously. Read The Hero With A Thousand Faces and The Power of Myth by Joseph Campbell. The points above seem so familiar because they’ve resonated to us over and over and over again, down through the centuries. They’re central to human storytelling, so it’s no surprise, really, that Joe and I would end up drinking from the same well. Let’s look at a few in particular.
Two ancient races, one devoted to chaos, the other to order, have been at war for millennia.
There are only so many fundamental dichotomies you can pull from. Order and chaos didn’t start with Babylon 5. And if I’d gone with good versus evil — which I find far duller to think about — would I be ripping off Lord of the Rings? Harry Potter? Or the Bible?
One of the ancients is still buried on a forgotten world at the edge of the galaxy, waiting to be woken up.
Golden’s Shadow Saga did the same shtick with Charlemagne. As have countless others. And hey, at least in my version the ancient in question is actually a dragon. Y’know. Tradition.
Our first contact with the most powerful of the younger races results in a war based on a misunderstanding.
Remember in the King Arthur mythology how Arthur and Mordred’s armies were poised to fight, but tried one last time to negotiate, until a soldier raised his sword to kill a snake and the other side thought it was an attack? Again, this is a mythic motif that has repeated over and over again in multiple cultures. Come to think of it, this aspect of UC is really ripping off every single episode of Three’s Company.
The central human hero is a maverick military man with a troubled past, with initials nearly the same as the author’s.
Okay, the initials thing I’m definitely ripping off from Babylon 5. But as for the characters of Jack Killian and John Sheridan, they remind me a lot of Patton, MacArthur, and countless other war heroes in human history. This is a classic archetype, bordering on cliché, actually. I should be ashamed of myself.
Actually, let’s look some of Joe Straczynski’s answers when he was asked a similar question.
Okay, I’ve just read a bunch more of these…okay, I admit it, you got me…I’m doing Philip K. Dick right down the line…and I’m also doing George Orwell right down the line…and I’m doing Lord of the Rings beat for beat…and Chalker…and…and Cherryh…and I’m doing a variation on the Bible, and King Arthur, and the history of Babylon, and the Idylls of the King.… What? What’s that you say? You can’t be doing all of these right down the line, all at the same time? Sure I can. Because there IS no B5. There’s a blank signal that registers in your brain, triggering the last thing you read, or the most important thing you read. It’s a carefully rigged US Government psychological warfare experiment. I give up. jms
And
RE: “B5 is really X in disguise” You’re all right, and you’re all wrong. Is it Lord of the Rings? Dune? The Kennedy story? The saga of Camelot? The Foundation? A brief history of World War II? The Bible? All these and others have been broached to me by people absolutely sure that this was the model for the series. (And, as an aside, this kind of discussion generally happens only to TV writers; nobody here is doing a panel called “Is Startide Rising Really X in disguise?” This happens to TV writers because somehow it gets assumed that we haven’t got an idea in our heads that we didn’t swipe from somebody’s book. But that’s another topic for another time.) Babylon 5…is a Rohrsharch test. An ink blot created by smashing actors, archetypes, saga-structure, myth and language against a sheet of paper, folding it, and bashing it a few times. When you open it up and look inside, what you see is the saga closest to your heart and your experience. Because like all the works mentioned a moment ago, B5 draws upon the same wellspring of myth, archetype, symbology, and dime store sociology that feeds all sagas, from the Iliad on through to the present. Writers, science fiction writers in particular, are like the beggar in Aladdin, who offered new lamps for old…we seize myths that have fallen out of currency and recast them in newer guise, dust them off and hope a genie emerges. Our myths, the myths of Tolkien and Homer, of Heinlein and Mallory, are eternal; they exchange one name for another, cast off one mask and assume the next. If you perceive their presence in Babylon 5, it is because we have courted the myth, not because we have echoed one of their names from another place. King Lear vanishes into Londo, Cassandra peers out from behind the eyes of G’Kar, Galahad answers to the name Ivanova, the Oracle at Delphi is now wearing an encounter suit, and Sir Bedevere is…well, that would be telling. So you’re all right. And you’re all wrong. Because it’s all ACTUALLY based on the 1967 Young Juveniles novel “The Mad Scientists’ Club.” And I’m actually channeling Eleanor Roosevelt. (Fortunately, I already have the wardrobe.) Oh, yes…and I am the walrus, coo-coo ka choo.… jms
And there endeth the lesson.

Recent Comments