<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to read a book on your phone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jeffkirvin.net/2009/12/how-to-read-a-book-on-your-phone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jeffkirvin.net/2009/12/how-to-read-a-book-on-your-phone/</link>
	<description>A distant chipmunk on the horizon</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 03:05:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The plan</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffkirvin.net/2009/12/how-to-read-a-book-on-your-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-4030</link>
		<dc:creator>The plan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffkirvin.net/?p=483#comment-4030</guid>
		<description>[...] those that want some­thing to put on a shelf — or don’t take my advice about how to read ebooks com­fort­ably—I’ll also be pub­lish­ing each book via either Lulu or Cre­ate­Space—haven’t decided [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] those that want some­thing to put on a shelf — or don’t take my advice about how to read ebooks com­fort­ably—I’ll also be pub­lish­ing each book via either Lulu or Cre­ate­Space—haven’t decided […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e-Book Echo: Que Gets More Magazines; Read on the Phone; Top Gadgets Named [jkOnTheRun] &#124; BYOHosting.com Blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffkirvin.net/2009/12/how-to-read-a-book-on-your-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-4029</link>
		<dc:creator>e-Book Echo: Que Gets More Magazines; Read on the Phone; Top Gadgets Named [jkOnTheRun] &#124; BYOHosting.com Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 09:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffkirvin.net/?p=483#comment-4029</guid>
		<description>[...] of the display. Novelist Jeff Kirvin is a big fan of reading books on the phone, and his article How to Read a Book on Your Phone is a must-read for those wanting to maximize the pleasure of doing so. Jeff covers the basic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] of the display. Novelist Jeff Kirvin is a big fan of reading books on the phone, and his article How to Read a Book on Your Phone is a must-read for those wanting to maximize the pleasure of doing so. Jeff covers the basic […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bowerbird</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffkirvin.net/2009/12/how-to-read-a-book-on-your-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-4026</link>
		<dc:creator>bowerbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 07:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffkirvin.net/?p=483#comment-4026</guid>
		<description>jeff- 
 
i&#039;ve seen the research.  most of it is old, 
and little can be described as well-done. 
 
besides, it&#039;s based on the notion there 
is one (and only one) &quot;correct&quot; answer. 
 
it&#039;s entirely possible half the population 
finds one thing to be &quot;more readable&quot; 
while the other half finds another to be 
&quot;more readable&quot;, never the twain to meet. 
 
nobody even really _defines_ readability 
in a way that seems satisfactory to me... 
 
reading speed is a non-starter, to my mind. 
and reading comprehension is far too hard 
to measure reliably. retention is important, 
but needs to be measure in the long-term, 
not on a 1-minute versus 10-minutes way. 
 
&quot;comfort&quot; seems to me to be the best one, 
and who better to gauge how &quot;comfortable&quot; 
a person is than that very person themself? 
 
so personal choice is the rosetta stone here, 
as far as i&#039;m concerned, and since choice is 
completely compatible with e-books, why not? 
 
-bowerbird 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jeff– </p>
<p>i’ve seen the research.  most of it is old,<br />
and little can be described as well-done. </p>
<p>besides, it’s based on the notion there<br />
is one (and only one) “correct” answer. </p>
<p>it’s entirely possible half the population<br />
finds one thing to be “more readable“<br />
while the other half finds another to be<br />
“more readable”, never the twain to meet. </p>
<p>nobody even really _defines_ readability<br />
in a way that seems satisfactory to me… </p>
<p>reading speed is a non-starter, to my mind.<br />
and reading comprehension is far too hard<br />
to measure reliably. retention is important,<br />
but needs to be measure in the long-term,<br />
not on a 1-minute versus 10-minutes way. </p>
<p>“comfort” seems to me to be the best one,<br />
and who better to gauge how “comfortable“<br />
a person is than that very person themself? </p>
<p>so personal choice is the rosetta stone here,<br />
as far as i’m concerned, and since choice is<br />
completely compatible with e-books, why not? </p>
<p>–bowerbird</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffkirvin</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffkirvin.net/2009/12/how-to-read-a-book-on-your-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-4024</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffkirvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 02:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffkirvin.net/?p=483#comment-4024</guid>
		<description>Wow, typography is a lot more personal than I expected. I just want to get people thinking about typography. My &quot;preferences&quot; as you put it, are based on lots of research (done by others, but I can read their findings) into on-screen readability. These are best practices, but they&#039;re certainly not law. If something else works better for you, great, go with Kosh. I&#039;m just trying to point people in the right direction and most importantly, clue them in that they don&#039;t have to stick with the defaults if they find that an unsatisfactory experience. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, typography is a lot more personal than I expected. I just want to get people thinking about typography. My “preferences” as you put it, are based on lots of research (done by others, but I can read their findings) into on-screen readability. These are best practices, but they’re certainly not law. If something else works better for you, great, go with Kosh. I’m just trying to point people in the right direction and most importantly, clue them in that they don’t have to stick with the defaults if they find that an unsatisfactory experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffkirvin</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffkirvin.net/2009/12/how-to-read-a-book-on-your-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-4023</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffkirvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 02:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffkirvin.net/?p=483#comment-4023</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Tim. I agree that the biggest impediment to getting people to like ebooks is getting people to try ebooks. But I also think typography matters, and can make a big difference in the reading experience. 
 
Good call on my blog typography. I&#039;ve tweaked the CSS in my theme (along with installing a typography plugin) to bring my blog more in line with what I consider optimum readability. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Tim. I agree that the biggest impediment to getting people to like ebooks is getting people to try ebooks. But I also think typography matters, and can make a big difference in the reading experience. </p>
<p>Good call on my blog typography. I’ve tweaked the CSS in my theme (along with installing a typography plugin) to bring my blog more in line with what I consider optimum readability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bowerbird</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffkirvin.net/2009/12/how-to-read-a-book-on-your-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-4022</link>
		<dc:creator>bowerbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 01:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffkirvin.net/?p=483#comment-4022</guid>
		<description>jeff-

you&#039;ve laid out a pretty good path of questions
that people should ask themselves to answer...

unfortunately, you suggested what their answers
should be, according to your _own_ preferences.

i find that, when having people choose the best
font for themselves, they don&#039;t have any problem
doing that.  you suggest the best choice will be a
serif font, but i&#039;ve found that roughly half of the
population will disagree with you on that matter.

likewise, you suggest a measure of 6-8 words,
which then sets the font-size, but i&#039;ve found that
it&#039;s best to let people choose their own font-size,
regardless of how that choice affects the measure.

i agree with you that &quot;healthy&quot; margins are nice, but
i&#039;ve found that people disagree on what that means.
so once again, it&#039;s best to let &#039;em make the decision.

as for leading, i find that people usually have a solid
idea about what constitutes &quot;too much&quot; and &quot;too little&quot;,
and will quickly and easily converge on their choice...

ditto with block-paragraphs versus book-indentation.
the user-preference usually comes quickly and easily.

and again with justification.  some people like it and
others don&#039;t, so just let them decide for themselves.

as for hyphenation, their are other considerations here.
first and foremost is whether the hardware can handle it.
and even if the hardware can, often the software cannot.
plus, you need to consider if the software is sufficiently
advanced to do its searches without hyphenation glitches.

getting back to personal preferences, though, you tell
people what they should be doing, based on what _you_
prefer, when it comes to font color and background color
(and textures), when the truth of the matter is that they
should do what makes reading easy for _them_, not you.

in particular, you imply that _high-contrast_ is the best,
especially in terms of avoiding eye-strain.  but many find
that a high contrast causes them the _most_ eye-strain!
suck people like dark-grey type on a cream background,
and who am i (or you) to tell &#039;em differently?  who indeed?

like you, i&#039;ve not been able to make scrolling work for me.
but i&#039;m sure not gonna argue with someone who _has_...

likewise, i find it ironic that you advise that people should
eliminate all the background buttons, but then you admit
that you leave the progress-bar on, as well as the clock...
you have good reasons for doing that, i understand well,
and i suppose that other people would have good reasons
for leaving on whatever paraphernalia that they leave on.
and again, who are we to argue with them?

again, as i said at the outset, you&#039;ve given people a great
checklist of items to consider.  i just wish you wouldn&#039;t
have tried to fill in that checklist for them.  they can do it.

-bowerbird</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jeff–</p>
<p>you’ve laid out a pretty good path of questions<br />
that people should ask themselves to answer…</p>
<p>unfortunately, you suggested what their answers<br />
should be, according to your _own_ preferences.</p>
<p>i find that, when having people choose the best<br />
font for themselves, they don’t have any problem<br />
doing that.  you suggest the best choice will be a<br />
serif font, but i’ve found that roughly half of the<br />
population will disagree with you on that matter.</p>
<p>likewise, you suggest a measure of 6–8 words,<br />
which then sets the font-size, but i’ve found that<br />
it’s best to let people choose their own font-size,<br />
regardless of how that choice affects the measure.</p>
<p>i agree with you that “healthy” margins are nice, but<br />
i’ve found that people disagree on what that means.<br />
so once again, it’s best to let ‘em make the decision.</p>
<p>as for leading, i find that people usually have a solid<br />
idea about what constitutes “too much” and “too little”,<br />
and will quickly and easily converge on their choice…</p>
<p>ditto with block-paragraphs versus book-indentation.<br />
the user-preference usually comes quickly and easily.</p>
<p>and again with justification.  some people like it and<br />
others don’t, so just let them decide for themselves.</p>
<p>as for hyphenation, their are other considerations here.<br />
first and foremost is whether the hardware can handle it.<br />
and even if the hardware can, often the software cannot.<br />
plus, you need to consider if the software is sufficiently<br />
advanced to do its searches without hyphenation glitches.</p>
<p>getting back to personal preferences, though, you tell<br />
people what they should be doing, based on what _you_<br />
prefer, when it comes to font color and background color<br />
(and textures), when the truth of the matter is that they<br />
should do what makes reading easy for _them_, not you.</p>
<p>in particular, you imply that _high-contrast_ is the best,<br />
especially in terms of avoiding eye-strain.  but many find<br />
that a high contrast causes them the _most_ eye-strain!<br />
suck people like dark-grey type on a cream background,<br />
and who am i (or you) to tell ‘em differently?  who indeed?</p>
<p>like you, i’ve not been able to make scrolling work for me.<br />
but i’m sure not gonna argue with someone who _has_…</p>
<p>likewise, i find it ironic that you advise that people should<br />
eliminate all the background buttons, but then you admit<br />
that you leave the progress-bar on, as well as the clock…<br />
you have good reasons for doing that, i understand well,<br />
and i suppose that other people would have good reasons<br />
for leaving on whatever paraphernalia that they leave on.<br />
and again, who are we to argue with them?</p>
<p>again, as i said at the outset, you’ve given people a great<br />
checklist of items to consider.  i just wish you wouldn’t<br />
have tried to fill in that checklist for them.  they can do it.</p>
<p>–bowerbird</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim O'Reilly</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffkirvin.net/2009/12/how-to-read-a-book-on-your-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-4019</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim O'Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 23:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffkirvin.net/?p=483#comment-4019</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a bit perplexed by the advice you give, considering that with regard to font, line length, ragged margins, indents, and so on, your blog follows none of it.  Reading is reading. And most of us are reading sans-serif fonts all day, with long line lengths, ragged margins, and white space between paragraphs rather than indents.

I find that the default settings in Stanza and the Kindle app on the iPhone are both pretty good.  I find myself quite happy reading either.  Many of the books aren&#039;t well formatted, but a lot of print books aren&#039;t well formatted either.

My experience is that people who say &quot;I could never read a book on an iPhone&quot; have actually just never tried it.  It&#039;s in the same class as all the comments from people who say &quot;who would read blogs; I don&#039;t want to hear about someone&#039;s cat&quot;, or more recently, &quot;what&#039;s the point of twitter; I don&#039;t want to hear about what you had for lunch.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m a bit perplexed by the advice you give, considering that with regard to font, line length, ragged margins, indents, and so on, your blog follows none of it.  Reading is reading. And most of us are reading sans-serif fonts all day, with long line lengths, ragged margins, and white space between paragraphs rather than indents.</p>
<p>I find that the default settings in Stanza and the Kindle app on the iPhone are both pretty good.  I find myself quite happy reading either.  Many of the books aren’t well formatted, but a lot of print books aren’t well formatted either.</p>
<p>My experience is that people who say “I could never read a book on an iPhone” have actually just never tried it.  It’s in the same class as all the comments from people who say “who would read blogs; I don’t want to hear about someone’s cat”, or more recently, “what’s the point of twitter; I don’t want to hear about what you had for lunch.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e-Book Echo: Que Gets More Magazines; Read on the Phone; Top Gadgets Named</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffkirvin.net/2009/12/how-to-read-a-book-on-your-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-4014</link>
		<dc:creator>e-Book Echo: Que Gets More Magazines; Read on the Phone; Top Gadgets Named</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 21:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffkirvin.net/?p=483#comment-4014</guid>
		<description>[...] of the display. Novelist Jeff Kirvin is a big fan of reading books on the phone, and his article How to Read a Book on Your Phone is a must-read for those wanting to maximize the pleasure of doing so. Jeff covers the basic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] of the display. Novelist Jeff Kirvin is a big fan of reading books on the phone, and his article How to Read a Book on Your Phone is a must-read for those wanting to maximize the pleasure of doing so. Jeff covers the basic […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: badzed</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffkirvin.net/2009/12/how-to-read-a-book-on-your-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-4002</link>
		<dc:creator>badzed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 13:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffkirvin.net/?p=483#comment-4002</guid>
		<description>Great article!


I feel that a color combination of dark green on light amber is the easiest on the eyes when reading for prolonged periods of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article!</p>
<p>I feel that a color combination of dark green on light amber is the easiest on the eyes when reading for prolonged periods of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alain (borax99)</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffkirvin.net/2009/12/how-to-read-a-book-on-your-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-3988</link>
		<dc:creator>Alain (borax99)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffkirvin.net/?p=483#comment-3988</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;

I agree, but I have found a solution - ereader software allows for adjusting the scroll speed ***while*** reading. Works like a charm. You can zip along at freeway speeds, but slow to a crawl when you hit a rough patch. You can also stop, page around and resume scrolling when the mood strikes. 

On a mouse-driven machine, ereader&#039;s scroll speed is controlled by the mouse&#039;s scroll wheel. It can also be done by using the cursor control keys (arrow up to slow down, arrow down to speed up).

On the Viliv S5, it&#039;s done by using the scroll stick.

All of your other comments and suggestions are dead on, there are numerous adjustments to be made, depending on screen size - and the smaller the screen, the more adjustments you require.

A note about contrast, I tried black text on off-white, but have gone to black text over very light blue-grey background at the lowest brightness settings - this works very well for me in low-light situations.

Thanks for a heckuva post !&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></p>
<p>I agree, but I have found a solution — ereader software allows for adjusting the scroll speed ***while*** reading. Works like a charm. You can zip along at freeway speeds, but slow to a crawl when you hit a rough patch. You can also stop, page around and resume scrolling when the mood strikes. </p>
<p>On a mouse-driven machine, ereader’s scroll speed is controlled by the mouse’s scroll wheel. It can also be done by using the cursor control keys (arrow up to slow down, arrow down to speed up).</p>
<p>On the Viliv S5, it’s done by using the scroll stick.</p>
<p>All of your other comments and suggestions are dead on, there are numerous adjustments to be made, depending on screen size — and the smaller the screen, the more adjustments you require.</p>
<p>A note about contrast, I tried black text on off-white, but have gone to black text over very light blue-grey background at the lowest brightness settings — this works very well for me in low-light situations.</p>
<p>Thanks for a heckuva post !</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

