Quantum of awesome

I wasn’t sure they could top Casino Royale, and I”m not sure they did, pre­cisely. What they did with the new Bond movie is con­tinue the story from Casino Royale with­out miss­ing a beat or drop­ping the inten­sity. I won’t give too much away, but I will say I was damn impressed by how smoothly this tran­si­tioned from the first film. As a fan of the orig­i­nal Ian Flem­ing nov­els, I’m also amazed at how they were able to recap­ture the sense of no-​nonsense (there is no Q, and very few gad­gets) bad-​assery in a post Cold War world. Make no mis­take, this Bond doesn’t quip, doesn’t waste time mug­ging for the cam­era. These are seri­ous professionals.

That said, some lessons learned.

  • Do not build a build­ing out of hydro­gen fuel cells. You’re just ask­ing for trou­ble. Oh, the humanity.
  • If some­one implies that they’re watch­ing you, for god’s sake, don’t get up and storm out of the opera.
  • Never, for any rea­son, pull over at a Boli­vian traf­fic stop.
  • Oh, and don’t give James Bond a rea­son to want you dead.
This entry was posted in Writing. Bookmark the permalink.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

One Response to Quantum of awesome

  1. johnc says:

    I don’t think it’s as good as Casino. (The ini­tial chase scene in Casino is one of the coolest things in cin­ema.) How­ever, I feel it is a bet­ter than aver­age Bond film, pos­si­bly in the top 25%. Also, the quips are there, it’s just that the deliv­ery is dryer than a martini.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>